An Emerging Issue: Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Solid-Organ Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria have increased globally. Solid-organ transplant recipients are more prone to these infections. This study aimed to compare the clinical courses of carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections and to identify risk factors for carbapenem resistance in solid-organ transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective descriptive study, data for solid-organ transplant recipients (age ≥18) treated from 2015 to 2022 were obtained from medical records. Enterobacteriaceaepositive blood culture was screened from laboratory data. RESULTS: Among 72 patients, there were 100 bacteremia episodes. Patients included 40 kidney (55.6%), 21 liver (29.2%), 7 heart (9.7%), and 4 combined liver and kidney (5.6%) transplant recipients. Fifty-seven bacteremia episodes were recorded between 2015 and 2020, and 43 bacteremia episodes were recorded between 2020 and 2022. Carbapenem resistance was reported in 15.8% of patients before 2020, whereas this rate increased to 39.5% after 2020 (P = .007). Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 (P < .001), Charlson comorbidity index ≥4 (P = .021), chronic liver disease (P = .015), septic shock at admission (P = .001), hypotension at admission (P = .006), bacteremia episodes 48 hours after hospitalization (P = .004), hospitalization in the past 3 months (P = .004), and prior invasive procedure (P = .043) were significant factors for carbapenem resistance. Logistic regression analysis showed that bacteremia 48 hours after hospitalization (P = .002) and hospitalization in the past 3 months (P = .006) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem resistance increased significantly over the years. Bacteremia 48 hours after hospitalization and hospitalization within the past 3 months were determined to be risk factors for carbapenem resistance. Carbapenem-resistant infections are still nosocomial infections. Patients should be hospitalized for as a short time as possible, and both patients and their physicians should follow infection control and prevention methods.

Cefepime versus carbapenems for treatment of AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections.

PURPOSE: Cefepime is recommended for treating infections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-PE), though supporting evidence is limited. Therefore, this study compared outcomes associated with cefepime versus carbapenem therapy for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-PE after phenotypic exclusion of ESBL-co-producing isolates. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared definite cefepime versus carbapenem treatment for AmpC-PE BSI in hospitalized patients of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, between 01/2015 and 07/2020. Primary outcomes included in-hospital death, renal impairment and neurologic adverse events; secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and recurrent infection. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy episodes of AmpC-PE BSI were included, 162, 77 and 31 were treated with a carbapenem, cefepime and other antibiotics, respectively. Patients treated with carbapenems were more likely to be transferred to the ICU on admission and more frequently had central venous catheter as a source of infection. In uni- and multivariable analyses, primary and secondary outcomes did not differ between the two treatment groups, except for more frequent occurrence of neurological adverse events among patients treated with carbapenems and shorter length of hospital stay among survivors treated with cefepime. CONCLUSION: After excluding isolates with phenotypic ESBL-co-production, cefepime was not associated with adverse outcomes compared to carbapenems when used to treat BSIs caused by AmpC-PE. Our study provides evidence to support the use of cefepime as a safe treatment strategy for AmpC-PE BSI, particularly in clinically stable patients without initial renal impairment or increased susceptibility to neurological adverse events.

Efficacy and nephrotoxicity of polymyxin B in elderly patients with carbapenem resistant bacterial infection.

BACKGROUND: To study the efficacy and nephrotoxicity of polymyxin B in the treatment of elderly patients with carbapenem-resistant organism (CRO) infection. METHODS: The clinical and microbiological data of patients with CRO-infected sepsis treated with polymyxin B were retrospectively analyzed. The effective rate, bacterial clearance, incidence and recovery rate of acute renal injury (AKI) and prognosis-related indicators in AKI at different stages were compared. RESULTS: The effective rate of 215 elderly patients with CRO infection treated with polymyxin was 50.7%. The total bacterial clearance rate was 44.2%, the total incidence of AKI was 37.2%, the recovery rate of AKI was 35%, and the incidence range of polymyxin B-related AKI was 10.2-37.2%. Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that the predictors of AKI in elderly patients were high APACHE II score, long duration of polymyxin, chronic renal insufficiency and ineffective outcome; the ROC curve showed that the cutoff value for predicting AKI was a serum creatinine concentration of 73 mmol/L before polymyxin B use, and the AUC was 0.931. CONCLUSIONS: Rational use of polymyxin B is safe and effective in elderly patients with CRO infection, and its effective outcome can improve the recovery rate of AKI.

Comparing novel antibiotics and carbapenems for complicated intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-sparing antibiotics are needed urgently for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Although several novel antibiotics - novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (e.g. ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam) and a novel tetracycline derivative (eravacycline) - have been developed for cIAIs, it remains unclear whether these antibiotics are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of cIAIs. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until 1 October 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics against carbapenems for patients with cIAIs were included. RESULTS: Among the 11 selected RCTs, no significant differences in clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit were observed between the study group and the control group on analysis of the clinically evaluable population [93.6% vs 93.7%, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.01; P=0.84], microbiologically evaluable population (93.0% vs 94.5%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; P=0.10) and modified intention-to-treat population (85.9% vs 87.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01; P=0.13). All findings were consistent across the subgroup analyses and sensitivity tests. Similarly, no significant difference in microbiological eradication was observed between the study group and the control group (87.8% vs 89.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01; P=0.18). The risk of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical efficacy, microbiological response and safety of the novel antibiotics, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and eravacycline, are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of patients with cIAIs. These agents can be potential therapeutic options as carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for cIAIs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of carbapenem antibiotics in critically ill patients: an overview of principles, recommended dosing regimens, and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of antibiotic treatment for sepsis in critically ill septic patients is well established. Consistently achieving the dose of antibiotics required to optimally kill bacteria, minimize the development of resistance, and avoid toxicity is challenging. The increasing understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of antibiotics, and the effects of critical illness on key PK/PD parameters, is gradually re-shaping how antibiotics are dosed in critically ill patients. AREAS COVERED: The PK/PD characteristics of commonly used carbapenem antibiotics, the principles of the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and current as well as future methods of utilizing TDM to optimally devise dosing regimens will be reviewed. The limitations and evidence-base supporting the use of carbapenem TDM to improve outcomes in critically ill patients will be examined. EXPERT OPINION: It is important to understand the principles of TDM in order to correctly inform dosing regimens. Although the concept of TDM is attractive, and the ability to utilize PK software to optimize dosing in the near future is expected to rapidly increase clinicians' ability to meet pre-defined PK/PD targets more accurately, current evidence provides only limited support for the use of TDM to guide carbapenem dosing in critically ill patients.

Beta-lactam hypersensitivity diagnosis in ambulatory and hospitalized settings require different approaches.

BACKGROUND: Data on beta-lactam hypersensitivity (BLH) are mainly focused on immediate or mild nonimmediate reactions in the ambulatory setting, but limited in patients with concurrent illness and moderate-to-severe nonimmediate reactions in the hospitalized setting. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the entire spectrum of BLH in Thai tertiary hospital. METHODS: Clinical characteristics of 357 patients with suspected BLH were evaluated in a 7-year period. Culprit drug identification was performed in 335 patients by combined skin testing, in vitro testing, or drug provocation tests. RESULTS: The predominant BLH presentations were non-immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated reactions with severe cutaneous adverse reactions of 18.9%, and BLH status was definitively confirmed in 18.1%. The most common verified culprits were cephalosporins (34.8%), particularly in hypersensitivity type IV reactions. Natural penicillins were the main implicated drugs in 48.5% of ambulatory patients. In contrast, cephalosporins and carbapenems were the main implicated drugs in hospitalized patients. Non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and serum sickness-like reaction remained diagnostically challenged. New generations of beta-lactams, hospitalized patients, recent allergic history, and underlying malignancies or autoimmune diseases were associated with increased BLH risk. CONCLUSION: At present, cephalosporins are the leading causes of BLH, particularly in non-IgE-mediated reactions. More research on the verification of non-IgE hypersensitivity reactions from new generations of beta-lactams should be better emphasized. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registry was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01667055; https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT01667055).

Probable Encephalopathy and Spasticity in a Multiple Sclerosis Patient Following Carbapenem Administration: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review.

Purpose: The purpose of this case report is to describe spasticity and encephalopathy that developed in a multiple sclerosis patient following carbapenem administration. Summary: A 55-year-old female with multiple sclerosis developed spasticity and encephalopathy within 24 hours of meropenem and ertapenem administration. This was the second time that she had developed encephalopathy following carbapenem administration. The patient gradually recovered over four days following discontinuation of carbapenem therapy. Conclusion: Carbapenem neurotoxicity, a well-documented adverse effect, has been linked to several risk factors, including central nervous system lesions. Despite this, there is little evidence describing the risk of neurotoxicity in patients with multiple sclerosis. It is important to understand the potential adverse effects of carbapenems in specific patient populations to help guide appropriate treatment of infections.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. All adult inpatients receiving 48 h of intravenous fosfomycin, alone or combined with other antibiotics were included in the study. Overall favorable clinical response rate was 75.3% among 94 patients. Clinical response rates were 92.3%, 72.2% and 56.0% for urinary tract infections, bacteremia and pneumonia, respectively. Microbiological eradication was achieved in 55 of 86 patients. 30-day mortality was 33.0%. Adverse events were generally mild. Common adverse events were hypokalemia (37.2%) and hypernatremia (22.3%). Intravenous fosfomycin is an effective antibiotic option with a good safety profile for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. The most favorable clinical and microbiological responses are obtained in urinary tract infections. The efficacy of the drug in more severe infections, such as pneumonia and bacteremia, is comparable to the literature.

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Several clinicians use ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), although no conclusive data support this practice. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of CRE bacteremia. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until 5 November 2021. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of CAZ-AVI with other regimens in CRE BSI were included if they reported data on mortality. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Eleven articles with 1,205 patients were included. CAZ-AVI groups showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality than control groups of other regimens (RR = 0.55, 95% CI of 0.45 to 0.68, P < 0.00001). The result is robust when a colistin-based regimen serves as the control group (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 of 0.69, P < 0.0001). In subgroup meta-analyses, the 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients infected with CRE producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (RR = 0.59, 95% CI of 0.46 to 0.75, P < 0.0001). Additionally, patients in CAZ-AVI groups had a significantly higher clinical cure rate (RR = 1.75, 95% CI of 1.57 to 2.18, P < 0.00001) and lower nephrotoxicity rate (RR = 0.41, 95% CI of 0.20 to 0.84, P = 0.02). No significant differences of relapse rates were demonstrated in 2 groups (RR = 0.69, 95% CI of 0.29 to 1.66, P = 0.41). Although the current study is based on observational studies with a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that CAZ-AVI treatment is effective and safe compared with other antibiotics, including colistin, in CRE BSI. IMPORTANCE Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been used as a frontline agent in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain unclear. Patients with CRE BSIs were often enrolled in small-sized clinical studies, together with other sites of infections, which reported pooled results. In this meta-analysis, the efficacy and safety were compared between CAZ-AVI and any other regimens used against CRE infections. The findings suggest that patients in the CAZ-AVI group had a significantly lower 30-day mortality than any other regimens and than colistin-based regimens. This paper provides a rationale for the use of CAZ-AVI in one of the most urgent antimicrobial-resistant infections of CRE bloodstream infections.

Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for oral antibiotic agents that are effective against multidrug-resistant gram-negative uropathogens. Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide is an orally bioavailable carbapenem with activity against uropathogenic Enterobacterales, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and fluoroquinolone-resistant strains. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of orally administered tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide as compared with intravenous ertapenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or acute pyelonephritis. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (at a dose of 600 mg every 8 hours) or intravenous ertapenem (at a dose of 1 g every 24 hours) for 7 to 10 days (or up to 14 days in patients with bacteremia). The primary efficacy end point was overall response (a composite of clinical cure and favorable microbiologic response) at a test-of-cure visit (on day 19, within a ±2-day window) in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population. The noninferiority margin was 12.5%. RESULTS: A total of 1372 hospitalized adult patients were enrolled; 868 patients (63.3%) were included in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population (50.8% of whom had complicated urinary tract infections and 49.2% of whom had pyelonephritis). An overall response was seen in 264 of 449 patients (58.8%) who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide, as compared with 258 of 419 patients (61.6%) who received ertapenem (weighted difference, -3.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.7 to 3.2). Clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit was observed in 93.1% of the patients in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide and 93.6% of patients who received ertapenem (weighted difference, -0.6 percentage point; 95% CI, -4.0 to 2.8); the majority of patients with microbiologic response failures at the test-of-cure visit were asymptomatic patients with recurrent bacteriuria. Secondary and subgroup analyses were supportive of the primary analysis. Adverse events were observed in 25.7% of patients who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide and in 25.6% of patients who received ertapenem; the most common adverse events were mild diarrhea and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide was noninferior to intravenous ertapenem in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection and acute pyelonephritis and had a similar safety profile. (Funded by Spero Therapeutics and the Department of Health and Human Services; ADAPT-PO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03788967.).

The Effect of Beta-lactam Allergy Status on the Rate of Surgical Site Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients with reported BL allergies have increased odds of developing SSI compared to reported NBL allergic patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI represent a significant risk of morbidity and mortality for patients. Cefazolin-based perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is the guideline-recommended drug-of-choice for most procedures. Due to over-reporting of BL allergies, many patients may not receive guideline-directed cephalosporin-based prophylaxis, which may result in an increased SSI rate. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort design study was performed. Data was collected on all targeted surgical procedures: cesarean section, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy, colon, laminectomy, and spinal fusion surgeries. RESULTS: During the study period, 2676 procedures were analyzed with 454 (17%) and 2222 (83%) in reported BL and NBL allergic cohorts, respectively. Significantly more SSI developed in the BL cohort versus NBL cohort (3.1% vs 1.5%, odds ratio 2.015; 95% confidence interval, 1.090-3.724; P = 0.023). Through a multivariate logistic regression, receipt of a NBL antibiotic regimen was the only variable to have a significant effect on SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio, 3.815; 95% confidence interval, 1.142-12.749; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Reported BL allergic patients have an increased odds of developing SSI in comparison to NBL allergic patients. The increased risk is likely related to administration of NBL antibiotic regimens in comparison to BL-based regimens. Thorough antibiotic allergy history collection can be a valuable SSI prevention tool to safely increase the proportion of patients receiving BL regimen.

Evaluation of First-Dose, Intravenous Push Penicillins and Carbapenems in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Early appropriate antibiotic administration is associated with improved outcomes in infectious illnesses. During drug shortages in 2017, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists recommended intravenous push (IVP) administration of medications when possible to conserve small-volume parenteral solutions. Data supporting IVP penicillins and carbapenems was limited. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study compared time from patient emergency department (ED) arrival to antibiotic administration between IVP and intravenous piggy-back (IVPB) administration. METHODS: This single-center pre-post protocol study assessed changes in administration timing and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ertapenem from 2015-2018. Medication administration by IVPB (pre) or IVP (post), ED arrival, antibiotic order and administration times, potential effectors of administration time, and safety events were assessed. Acquisition costs were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 696 administrations were included, with 351 and 345 subjects in the IVPB and IVP cohorts, respectively. The median time from ED arrival to initiation of antibiotic administration was 140 (IQR 87-221) minutes and 110 (IQR 68-181) minutes in the IVPB and IVP cohorts, respectively, (P < 0.01). IVP administration increased the proportion of indexed antibiotics administered within 60 minutes of ED arrival compared to IVPB (20% vs. 12%, respectively, P < 0.01). There was no difference in adverse events between both cohorts. Supply acquisition cost savings totaled an more than $5,000 with the IVP protocol. CONCLUSION: IVP administration of ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ertapenem improved times to initiation of empiric, first-dose antibiotics in the ED without an increase in adverse events, saving over $5,000 annually.

Safety evaluation of current therapies for high-risk severely ill patients with carbapenem-resistant infections.

INTRODUCTION: Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) are increasingly frequent events, which are associated with a high mortality rate. Traditionally, combination regimens including high doses of "old antibiotics" such as polymyxins, tigecycline, and aminoglycosides have been used to treat these infections, but they were often associated with low efficacy and high excess of side effects and toxicity, especially nephrotoxicity. Along with the development of new compounds, the last decade has seen substantial improvements in the management of CR infections. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we aimed to discuss the safety characteristics and tolerability of different new options for treatment of CR infections. EXPERT OPINION: The availability of new drugs showing a potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB represents a unique opportunity to face the threat of resistance, while potentially reducing toxicity. A thorough understanding of the safety profile from clinical trials may guide the use of these new drugs in critically ill patients at high risk for the development of adverse events. Future data coming from real-life studies for drugs targeting CR infections are crucial to confirm the safety profile observed in pivotal trials.

Caracterização molecular e fenotípica de Klebsiella spp. produtoras de NDM / Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Klebsiella spp. NDM producers

O perfil de resistência, que algumas das espécies do complexo Klebsiella pneumoniae podem expressar, representa uma grande ameaça à saúde humana, particularmente quando resistentes aos carbapenêmicos, que são amplamente utilizados no tratamento de infecções graves em pacientes hospitalizados. O principal mecanismo de resistência aos carbapenêmicos é a produção de carbapenemases, particularmente dos tipos KPC e NDM. Um dos compostos desenvolvidos para o tratamento de infecções causadas por cepas produtoras de KPC é a combinação ceftazidimaavibactam (CAZ-AVI), mas que não tem atividade inibitória sobre metalo-betalactamases, a exemplo das NDMs. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram determinar a frequência das espécies do complexo K. pneumoniae e da coprodução de KPC, avaliar a clonalidade dos isolados, a sensibilidade ao aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), o desempenho do disco de meropenem (MEM) com inibidores para detecção de coprodução de NDM e KPC e desenvolver um teste de triagem para prever a sensibilidade ao ATM-AVI. Um total de 113 isolados do complexo K. pneumoniae produtoras de NDM ou coprodutoras de NDM e KPC, provenientes da coleção de bactérias do Grupo Fleury, coletadas períodos pré e pós início do uso de CAZ-AVI no Brasil, foram utilizadas neste estudo. A identificação da espécie e a presença dos genes blaNDM e blaKPC foi confirmada por PCR multiplex. A clonalidade dos isolados foi avaliada por eletroforese em campos pulsados (PFGE) após clivagem com XbaI. A produção de carbapenemases foi confirmada utilizando-se o teste Blue Carba. O desempenho dos discos de meropenem e CAZ-AVI contendo um ou mais inibidores de carbapenemases foi comparado com o teste molecular. A pré-difusão combinada foi realizada pré-incubando-se o ágar não inoculado com disco de CAZ-AVI, e a seguir aplicando-se o inóculo bacteriano e um disco de ATM após remover o disco de CAZ-AVI. Após incubação, os halos foram aferidos e correlacionados com a concentração inibitória mínima para ATM-AVI. As CIMs para ATM e ATM-AVI foram determinadas segundo o EUCAST. A identificação das espécies por PCR evidenciou as seguintes frequências: K. pneumoniae 75,2% (n=85); K. quasipneumoniae 16,8% (n=19), e K. variicola 8% (n=9). Uma fração de 12,4% (n=14) dos isolados apresentaram os genes blaNDM e blaKPC e 87,6% (n=99) apenas blaNDM. A análise dos perfis de PFGE de K. pneumoniae evidenciou a presença de cinco grupos clonais predominantes. Isolados do principal grupo clonal Ap (n=15) foram detectados nas cidades de São Paulo e Porto Alegre durante todo o período analisado. O grupo clonal Lp foi detectado nas cidades de São Paulo e Recife em 2019. Os dois principais grupos clonais no período pré-CAZ-AVI continham maior número de isolados do que aqueles no período de uso do CAZ-AVI. Os perfis de PFGE de K. quasipneumoniae evidenciaram quatro grupos clonais predominantes, e presentes apenas no estado de São Paulo, com persistência do grupo clonal Aq desde 2017. Quanto à K. variicola, foram observados dois grupos clonais predominantes Av e Bv, o primeiro presente apenas em São Paulo desde 2018 e o segundo em Porto Alegre apenas em 2019. Calculando-se a diferença entre os diâmetros de halo do disco MEM contendo EDTA e ácido fenilborônico (AFB) e o maior dos halos obtidos para MEM com EDTA ou AFB, observou-se que todos os isolados com coexpressão de KPC e NDM apresentaram diferença ≥ 5 mm. Uma fração de 42,3% dos isolados positivos apenas para blaNDM apresentaram sensibilidade para ATM (CIM ≤ 4 mg/L). Todos os isolados testados apresentaram CIM para ATM-AVI ≤ 1/4 mg/L, sendo a CIM90 0,125/4 mg/l. No teste de pré-difusão combinada, o menor diâmetro de halo obtido foi de 23 mm. A espécie predominante na amostragem foi K. pneumoniae. A disseminação clonal, observada neste estudo, contrasta com a diversidade clonal descrita em outros locais do mundo para produtores de NDM, exceto Grécia e China. Considerando os pontos de corte atuais para ATM, é provável que haja resposta clínica adequada no uso de ATM-AVI no tratamento de infecções causadas por isolados produtores de NDM e coprodutores de KPC e NDM. Utilizando-se o valor de corte de ≤ 5 mm para a diferença entre halos de inibição, de MEM com AFB e EDTA e o segundo maior halo com inibidor, a sensibilidade foi de 100% e a especificidade foi de 96,1,0%. O método de pré-difusão com CAZ-AVI e ATM é um método simples e o diâmetro ≥ 23 mm tem excelente correlação com a CIM para ATM-AVI ≤ 1/4 mg/L

The resistance profile, which some species of the Klebsiella pneumoniae complex may express, represent a great threat to human health, particularly when resistant to carbapenems, which are widely used in the treatment of severe infections in hospitalized patients. The main mechanism of resistance to carbapenems is the production of carbapenemases, particularly KPCs and NDMs. One of the compounds developed for the treatment of infections caused by KPC-producing strains is the combination ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), but which has no inhibitory activity on metallobetalactamases, as is the case for NDMs. The objectives of this work were to determine the frequency of K. pneumoniae complex species and KPC co-production, evaluate the clonality of isolates, the susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), the performance of meropenem (MEM) disks with inhibitors for detecting NDM co-production and KPC and develop a screening test to predict sensitivity to ATM-AVI. A total of 113 NDM-producing or NDM and KPC co-producing K. pneumoniae complexes, from the Fleury Group's bacteria collection, collected in the pre- and post-starting periods of CAZ-AVI use in Brazil, were used in this study. Species identification and the presence of the blaNDM and blaKPC genes were confirmed by multiplex PCR. The clonality of the isolates was evaluated by pulsed field electrophoresis (PFGE) after cleavage with XbaI. Carbapenemase production was confirmed using the Blue Carba test. The performance of MEM and CAZ-AVI disks containing one or more carbapenemase inhibitors was compared with the molecular test. Combined pre-diffusion was performed by preincubating the uninoculated agar with a CAZ-AVI disk, and then applying the bacterial inoculum and na ATM disk after removal of the CAZ-AVI disk. After incubation, halos were measured and correlated with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ATM-AVI. ATM and ATM-AVI MICs were determined according to EUCAST. The identification of species by PCR evidenced the following frequencies: K. pneumoniae 75.2% (n=85); K. quasipneumoniae 16.8% (n=19), and K. variicola 8% (n=9). A fraction of 12.4% (n=14) of the isolates had the blaNDM and blaKPC genes and 87.6% (n=99) had only blaNDM. The analysis of the PFGE profiles of K. pneumoniae evidenced the presence of five predominant clonal groups. Isolates from the main clonal group Ap (n=16) were detected in the cities of São Paulo and Porto Alegre throughout the analyzed period. The clonal group Lp was detected in the cities of São Paulo and Recife 2019. The PFGE profiles of K. quasipneumoniae showed four predominant clonal groups, present only in the state of São Paulo, with persistence of the clonal group Aq since 2017. As for K. variicola, two predominant clonal groups Av and Bv were observed, the first present only in São Paulo since 2018 and the second in Porto Alegre only in 2019. Calculating the difference between the inhibition zone diameters of the MEM disk containing EDTA and phenylboronic acid (AFB) and the largest of the inhibition zone diameters obtained for MEM with EDTA or AFB, it was observed that all isolates with co-expression of KPC and NDM showed a difference 5 ≥mm. A fraction of 42.3% of isolates positive only for blaNDM showed sensitivity to ATM (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L). All tested isolates presented MIC for ATM-AVI ≤ 1/4 mg/L, being the MIC90 0.125/4 mg/l. In the combined pre-diffusion test, the smallest inhibition zone diameter obtained was 23 mm. The predominant species in the sample was K. pneumoniae, but a significant fraction of the other species in the complex was also observed in the sample. The clonal spread observed in this study contrasts with the clonal diversity described elsewhere in the world for NDM-producing isolates, except Greece and China. Considering the current cut-off points for ATM, it is likely that there is an adequate clinical response in the use of ATM-AVI in infections caused by NDM-producing and KPC-NDM co-producing isolates in Brazil. Using the cutoff value of 5 mm for the difference between inhibition zones, of MEM with AFB and EDTA and the second largest zone of MEM with inhibitor, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 96.1%. The pre-diffusion method with CAZ-AVI and ATM is a simple method and the diameter ≥ 23 mm has excellent correlation with the MIC for ATM-AVI ≤ 1/4 mg/L

Antiseptic 9-Meric Peptide with Potency against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infection.

Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infection can cause acute host reactions that lead to high-fatality sepsis, making it important to develop new therapeutic options. Previously, we developed a short 9-meric peptide, Pro9-3D, with significant antibacterial and cytotoxic effects. In this study, we attempted to produce safer peptide antibiotics against CRAB by reversing the parent sequence to generate R-Pro9-3 and R-Pro9-3D. Among the tested peptides, R-Pro9-3D had the most rapid and effective antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, particularly clinical CRAB isolates. Analyses of antimicrobial mechanisms based on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-neutralization, LPS binding, and membrane depolarization, as well as SEM ultrastructural investigations, revealed that R-Pro9-3D binds strongly to LPS and impairs the membrane integrity of CRAB by effectively permeabilizing its outer membrane. R-Pro9-3D was also less cytotoxic and had better proteolytic stability than Pro9-3D and killed biofilm forming CRAB. As an LPS-neutralizing peptide, R-Pro9-3D effectively reduced LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in RAW 264.7 cells. The antiseptic abilities of R-Pro9-3D were also investigated using a mouse model of CRAB-induced sepsis, which revealed that R-Pro9-3D reduced multiple organ damage and attenuated systemic infection by acting as an antibacterial and immunosuppressive agent. Thus, R-Pro9-3D displays potential as a novel antiseptic peptide for treating Gram-negative CRAB infections.

Clinical outcomes and safety of polymyxin B in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: a real-world multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: High morbidity and mortality due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) has led to the resurgence of polymyxin B (PMB) use in the last decade. The aim of our multicenter, real-world study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PMB in the treatment of CR-GNB infections. METHODS: The real-world study included patients treated with intravenous PMB for at least 7 days during the period of October 2018 through June 2019. Associations between these clinical features and 28-day mortality or all-cause hospital mortality were explored through univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The study included 100 patients. Many patients presented with combined chronic conditions, septic shock, mechanical ventilation, and the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae. The mean duration of PMB therapy was 11 days (range 7-38 days). Temperature (38 °C vs 37.1 °C), white blood cells (14.13 × 109/l vs 9.28 × 109/l), C-reactive protein (103.55 ug/l vs 47.60 ug/l), procalcitonin (3.89 ng/ml vs 1.70 ng/ml) and APACHE II levels (17.75 ± 7.69 vs 15.98 ± 7.95) were significantly decreased after PMB treatment. The bacteria eradication rate was 77.65%. The overall mortality at discharge was 15%, and 28-day mortality was 40%. Major adverse reactions occurred in 16 patients. Nephrotoxicity was observed in 7 patients (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide positive clinical and safety outcomes for PMB in the treatment of CR-GNB. Timely and appropriate use of PMB may be particularly useful in treating patients with sepsis in CR-GNB infections.

Treatment of Donor-derived Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection after Renal Transplantation with Tigecycline and Extended-infusion Meropenem.

OBJECTIVE: Donor-derived carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection has recently emerged as a critical early complication after renal transplantation. Although CRKP is usually sensitive to tigecycline, monotherapy with this drug is often less than effective. We investigated the efficacy of a combined regimen of tigecycline with high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem in the treatment of donor-derived CRKP infection after kidney transplantation. METHODS: From Jan. 2016 to Dec. 2017, a total of 12 CRKP isolates were detected from cultures of the organ preservation solution used for soaking the donor kidneys at our institute. Probable or possible donor-derived infection (DDI) was identified in 8 transplant recipients. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-2 (KPC-2)-producing CRKP was reported to be positive in organ preservation solution cultures at 3.5±0.9 days after transplantation, leading to surgical site (n=3), urinary tract (n=4), and/or bloodstream (n=2) infections in 8 recipients. The drug susceptibility tests showed that CRKP was sensitive to tigecycline, but resistant to meropenem. In 7 patients who received tigecycline combined with high-dose extended-infusion meropenem, DDIs were successfully cured. The length of hospital stay was 31 (18-129) days, and the serum creatinine at discharge was 105.8±16.7 µmol/L. The one remaining patient who received tigecycline combined with intravenous-drip meropenem died of septic shock. A median follow-up of 43 months (33-55) showed no recurrence of new CRKP infection in the 7 surviving recipients. CONCLUSION: It was suggested that a prompt and appropriate combination therapy using tigecycline with high-dose extended-infusion meropenem is effective in treating donor-derived KPC-2-producing CRKP infection after renal transplantation.

Eficacia y seguridad de ceftazidima-avibactam para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con neumonía intrahospitalaria asociada a ventilación mecánica causada por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina / Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of adult patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation caused by colistin-resistant gram-negative carbapenemase-producing bacteria

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de ceftazidima-avibactam (C-A) para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con neumonía intrahospitalaria asociada a ventilación mecánica (NAVM) causada por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina. La neumonía intrahospitalaria es la principal causa de muerte por infecciones adquiridas en el hospital. Aproximadamente, el 80 % de las neumonías intrahospitalarias corresponden a neumonías intrahospitalarias asociadas a ventilador mecánico (NAVM) con una mortalidad que puede llegar al 76 %, cuando la infección es causada por patógenos de alto riesgo. Actualmente, existen patógenos gram negativos extremadamente resistentes que producen betalactamasas capaces de hidrolizar antibióticos carbapenémicos llamados bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas. Hasta la fecha, existen pocas alternativas para el tratamiento de NAVM causada por bacterias productoras de carbapenemasas. Como opciones de última línea, se tienen esquemas basados en colistina más carbapenémicos. En EsSalud, estos pacientes tienen a su disposición esta combinación como última línea de tratamiento; sin embargo, algunos pacientes presentan infecciones resistentes a estos antibióticos, por lo cual no disponen de una alternativa terapéutica para controlar la infección. Así, los especialistas de EsSalud sugieren el uso de ceftazidima-avibactam (C-A) para el tratamiento de la NAVM por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina. La ceftazidima es una cefalosporina que inhibe la síntesis de la pared celular bacteriana, y el avibactam es un inhibidor de beta-lactamasa. Ambos son antibióticos cuya presentación en forma combinada ha sido aprobada por la Food and Drug Administration (FDA) y la European Medicines Agency (EMA) para el tratamiento de pacientes NAVM ocasionado por bacterias gram negativas. METODOLOGÍA: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad de C-A para el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con NAVM causada por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina. La búsqueda se inició con la revisión de la información sobre el uso del medicamento de acuerdo con entidades reguladoras como FDA, EMA, DIGEMID y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en las bases de datos PubMed, The Cochrane Library y LILACS. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda manual dentro de las páginas web pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica (GPC) incluyendo la National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), El Instituto de Calidad y Eficiencia en la Atención de la Salud (IQWiG, por sus siglas en alemán), la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), la OMS, el Ministerio de Salud del Perú (MINSA) y el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI). Además, se realizó una búsqueda de GPC de las principales sociedades o instituciones especializadas en infectología, tales como: Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) y la Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ALAT). Finalmente, se realizó una búsqueda en la página web de registro de ensayos clínicos (EC) www.clinicaltrials.gov, para identificar EC en curso o que no hayan sido publicados aún. RESULTADOS: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda de evidencia científica relacionada al uso de C-A como tratamiento de pacientes adultos con NAVM causada por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina. La presente sinopsis describe la evidencia disponible según el tipo de publicación, siguiendo lo indicado en los criterios de elegibilidad (GPC, ETS, RS con o sin meta análisis o metaanálisis en red y estudios primarios) que se obtuvieron de la búsqueda sistemática y la búsqueda adicional realizada en PubMed. CONCLUSIONES:  El presente dictamen preliminar tuvo por objetivo evaluar la mejor evidencia disponible en torno a la eficacia y seguridad de C-A en comparación la mejor terapia de soporte (continuar con carbapenémicos, colistina u otros), como tratamiento de pacientes adultos con NAVM causada por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina. No se identificaron GPC, ETS, RS o ECA que respondan a la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen. Tras ampliar los criterios de búsqueda y selección considerando los términos relacionados a la intervención y agentes gram negativos resistentes a carbapenémicos, se identificaron 4 estudios observacionales comparativos que incluían a la población de la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen. De los cuatro estudios incluidos, dos mostraron diferencia a favor de C-A en términos de mortalidad, tres reportaron respuesta clínica a favor de C-A y uno mostró mayor erradicación microbiológica a favor de C-A. Además, dos estudios que evaluaron seguridad estimaron que C-A tendría un mejor perfil de seguridad (menor daño renal) que otros antibióticos (entre ellos carbapenémicos y colistina). Debido al diseño y las limitaciones de estos estudios observacionales, no es posible establecer una relación causa-efecto entre el uso de C-A y los desenlaces evaluados. Sin embargo, sí nos ofrecen una descripción de la actividad antibacteriana y el perfil de seguridad de C-A. La NAVM es una enfermedad con alta mortalidad y los pacientes con NAVM por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina, no cuentan con una alternativa de tratamiento (vacío terapéutico) en EsSalud. La mejor terapia de soporte (continuar con carbapenémicos, colistina u otros disponibles en EsSalud), aumentaría el riesgo de desarrollar eventos adversos y resistencia bacteriana. Dicha resistencia bacteriana pone en riesgo a otros pacientes hospitalizados de adquirir infecciones resistentes, además incrementaría la estancia hospitalaria, los costos de atención y la mortalidad. Por lo expuesto, el IETSI aprueba el uso de C-A en pacientes pacientes adultos con NAVM causada por bacterias gram negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina, como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud. La vigencia del presente dictamen es de un año, según lo establecido en el Anexo N° 1 y la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de mayor evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Safety profile of carbapenems: Data mining of the FDA adverse events reporting system.

OBJECTIVE: To learn the safety profile of carbapenems and compare suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among carbapenem classes by data mining the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. MATERIALS: This retrospective study described the general characteristics of adverse drug event (ADE) reports related to carbapenems in the FAERS during 2015 - 2018. METHODS: The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the reporting odds ratio (ROR), and information component (IC) of Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) were calculated to identify potential safety signals. RESULTS: A total number of 5,899 reports associated with carbapenems were submitted to the FAERS from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. The most frequently reported ADE associated with carbapenems was drug ineffective (10.51%). Serious ADEs and death associated with carbapenems were reported in 41.24 and 25.12%, respectively. Infections and infestations was the strongest signal detected in both meropenem and imipenem. Nervous system disorders and psychiatric disorders were strongly detected in ertapenem. Hepatobiliary disorders were common in doripenem patients. CONCLUSION: Carbapenem resistance is alarming in the United States, and carbapenem is more likely to be associated with serious and fatal ADEs among ß-lactam antibiotics. Both differences and similarities exist in the safety profile among carbapenems classes. Close attention should be paid to patients with special disease when administrated carbapenems.

Prophylaxis and Treatment against Klebsiella pneumoniae: Current Insights on This Emerging Anti-Microbial Resistant Global Threat.

Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) is an opportunistic pathogen and the leading cause of healthcare-associated infections, mostly affecting subjects with compromised immune systems or suffering from concurrent bacterial infections. However, the dramatic increase in hypervirulent strains and the emergence of new multidrug-resistant clones resulted in Kp occurrence among previously healthy people and in increased morbidity and mortality, including neonatal sepsis and death across low- and middle-income countries. As a consequence, carbapenem-resistant and extended spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Kp have been prioritized as a critical anti-microbial resistance threat by the World Health Organization and this has renewed the interest of the scientific community in developing a vaccine as well as treatments alternative to the now ineffective antibiotics. Capsule polysaccharide is the most important virulence factor of Kp and plays major roles in the pathogenesis but its high variability (more than 100 different types have been reported) makes the identification of a universal treatment or prevention strategy very challenging. However, less variable virulence factors such as the O-Antigen, outer membrane proteins as fimbriae and siderophores might also be key players in the fight against Kp infections. Here, we review elements of the current status of the epidemiology and the molecular pathogenesis of Kp and explore specific bacterial antigens as potential targets for both prophylactic and therapeutic solutions.